People v. Austin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Andrias, J.P.
On this appeal, where defendant was convicted, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, based solely on the uncorroborated eyewitness testimony of the complaining witness, the issue presented is whether the trial court abused its discretion when it denied his pretrial motion to admit expert testimony on eyewitness identification. We find that, on the facts of this case, there was a sound exercise of discretion.
In denying defendant’s pretrial motion for permission to introduce expert testimony on the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. O'RamaNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- People v. LeGrandNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. VelasquezNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. CarrieriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. ChisolmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. NazarioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. ZohriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.