Legal Opinion

People v. Lee

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 2001PublishedCited by 177 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Graffeo, J.

In the 11 years since People v Mooney (76 NY2d 827), this Court has not been presented with an opportunity to revisit the admissibility of expert testimony proffered on the issue of the reliability of eyewitness identification. We now hold that, while such expert testimony is not inadmissible per se, the decision whether to admit it rests in the sound discretion of the trial court. Here, the trial court did not abuse that discretion in denying its introduction.

In the early morning, Michael Perani’s car was stolen at gunpoint in Manhattan. The robbery occurred in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. ChippNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. People v. CroninNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. People v. WesleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by177 opinions

  1. People v. LaneNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. People v. LeGrandNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Jeffrey Washington v. Sunny Schriver, Superintendent, Wallkill Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  5. People v. MuhammadNew York Court of Appeals · 2011

172 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API