State v. McLaughlin
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.
Based on renewed briefing that the state has submitted regarding the proper disposition in this case, we withdraw our opinion on reconsideration in State v. McLaughlin, 244 Or App 691, 260 P3d 814 (2011) (McLaughlin II). We write to explain the basis for our decision.
In our original opinion in this case, State v. McLaughlin, 243 Or App 214, 258 P3d 1241 (2011), we rejected defendant’s challenge to his conviction for first-degree theft but vacated the supplemental judgment of restitution because the prosecution did not present the minimum required notice of the nature and amount of restitution…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. BiscottiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. TippettsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. CanadyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. BeckhamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. WagonerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. Gudino-FloresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.