Legal Opinion

State v. Tippetts

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 15, 2010No. 08CR0154, 07CR0087 A140031 (Control), A140032PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

In these two consolidated cases, defendant was convicted of multiple crimes involving separate victims. In each case, the court imposed restitution for counseling costs for the victim and the victim’s mother. On appeal, defendant challenges his convictions in both cases and the imposition of restitution. We affirm defendant’s convictions without discussion and write only to address the issue of restitution.

The trial court imposed restitution pursuant to ORS 137.106(1), which allows a court to impose restitution if it “finds from the evidence presented that a victim suffered economic damages,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. EdsonOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. DonahueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. State v. BiscottiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. State v. NeeseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. BeckhamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. State v. YocumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. State v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API