Campbell v. Employment Security Department
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
¶1 Robert Campbell quit his job as a school teacher in anticipation of accompanying his wife to Finland on her Fulbright grant. Campbell applied for unemployment benefits for the months between his resignation in June 2010 and his family’s planned departure in February 2011. His request was denied because the Department of Employment Security (Department) determined that Campbell did not qualify for benefits as claimed under RCW 50.20.050(2)(b)(iii),1 also known as the “quit to follow” provision. This provision requires the unemployment claimant to stay in his or her position for “as long as…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tapper v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- King County v. Central Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Port of Seattle v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Verizon Northwest, Inc. v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Darkenwald v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Campbell v. Tacoma Public School District No. 10Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Riley-Hordyk v. Bethel School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Pederson v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- James Courtney v. Washington Util. and Transp. Comm'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.