Pellegrino v. United States Transportation Security Administration
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, Chief Judge.
Before this Court are Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 40), Plaintiffs Response in opposition thereto (Doc. No. 63), Defendants’ Reply (Doc. No. 66) and Plaintiffs Sur-Reply (Doc. No. 76). For the reasons set forth in this Memorandum, the Motion to Dismiss is granted in part and denied in part.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This case centers on what should have been a swift and routine airport security screening. Instead, the interactions between the parties escalated into a criminal prosecution that took nearly two years to…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Weinraub v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2012
- Corbett v. Transportation Security AdministrationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2012
- Godfrey v. Upland BoroughDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Hernandez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2014
- Loumiet v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.