Legal Opinion

Pellegrino v. United States Transportation Security Administration

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 28, 2012No. Civil Action No. 09-5505PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOYNER, Chief Judge.

Before this Court are Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 40), Plaintiffs Response in opposition thereto (Doc. No. 63), Defendants’ Reply (Doc. No. 66) and Plaintiffs Sur-Reply (Doc. No. 76). For the reasons set forth in this Memorandum, the Motion to Dismiss is granted in part and denied in part.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

This case centers on what should have been a swift and routine airport security screening. Instead, the interactions between the parties escalated into a criminal prosecution that took nearly two years to…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Weinraub v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2012
  2. Corbett v. Transportation Security AdministrationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2012
  3. Godfrey v. Upland BoroughDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Hernandez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2014
  5. Loumiet v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API