Pepsico, Inc. v. Triunfo-Mex, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
*432ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT TRIUNFO-MEX, INC.
PAEZ, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Pending before the Court is plaintiff Pepsi-Co, Inc.’s motion to enter a default judgment against defendant Triunfo-Mex, Inc. (“Triunfo”) for violations of the Tariff Act, 19 U.S.C. § 1526, and the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051-1125. Plaintiff seeks an injunction enjoining defendant from further violating section 526 of the Tariff Act and sections 32, 42, 43(a), and 43(e) of the Lanham Act. Plaintiff also seeks treble damages, plus costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees. Defendant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Taylor Made Golf Co. v. Carsten Sports, Ltd.District Court, S.D. California · 1997
3Cited by57 opinions
- Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Castworld Products, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Elektra Entertainment Group Inc. v. CrawfordDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
- Shanghai Automation Instrument Co., Ltd. v. KueiDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001
- Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. StreeterDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2006
- Irby v. Fashion Bug (In Re Irby)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.