Legal Opinion
Elektra Entertainment Group Inc. v. Crawford
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 11, 2005No. CV 04-5865 SJO(MCX)PublishedCited by 311 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
OTERO, District Judge.
This matter is before this court on Plaintiffs Elektra Entertainment Group, UMG *391Recording, Capital Records, and Sony Music Entertainment’s (“Plaintiffs”) Application for Default Judgment by the court pursuant to Rule 55(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Fed. R. Civ.P.”) and Local Rule 55. On September 9, 2004, default was entered against Defendant Joel A. Crawford (“Defendant”). For the reasons stated below, the court GRANTS the Motion for Default Judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
The Plaintiffs are four copyright…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Pepsico, Inc. v. California Security CansDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
- James v. FrameCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by311 opinions
- Arista Records LLC v. John Does 1-19District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Landstar Ranger, Inc. v. PARTH ENTERPRISES, INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Vogel v. Rite Aid Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. DelaneDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. FarmerDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2006
306 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.