Legal Opinion
King v. Thomson
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 13, 1979No. 7796PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLampron, C.J.
This is a petition for a writ of certiorari under RSA 490:4 seeking an order that the State pay the balance of legal fees and expenses owed by the plaintiff to his counsel. These expenses were incurred when the plaintiff, as a State official, defended himself against an unsuccessful proceeding under RSA 4:1 (1970) (amended Cum. Supp. 1978), to remove him from office. Although the State, as such, is not a party before us, an agency of the State, the New Hampshire Board of Probation, is a party defendant. RSA 507:8 (Supp. 1977). The removal proceeding was brought by the board of probation. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Peter Salvucci & Sons, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
- Wilson v. Personnel CommissionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Gagne v. Garrison Hill Greenhouses, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1954
- Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Judith S. Bastian v. Stephen M. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Arnold v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Horton v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- State Ex Rel. Steffen v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.