Legal Opinion
Horton v. McLaughlin
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided February 18, 2003No. 2001-580PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
The petitioners, Sherman D. Horton, Jr., David A. Brock, and John T. Broderick, Jr., appeal an order of the Superior Court (Fitzgerald, J.) dismissing their petition for declaratory judgment and other relief in which they sought reimbursement from the State of New Hampshire for legal fees and costs incurred during the course of their impeachment proceedings. We affirm.
The following facts are relevant to the disposition of this appeal. At all times pertinent to this matter, the petitioners were members of this court; petitioner. Brock as Chief Justice, and petitioners Horton and Broderick as…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Nixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- LeClair v. LeClairSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- In Re MussmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
- Silva v. BotschSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Larsen v. Senate of PennsylvaniaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Baines v. New Hampshire Senate PresidentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- STATE JUDICIAL STANDARDS COM'N v. EspinosaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- State ex rel. New Mexico Judicial Standards Commission v. EspinosaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- In re the Judicial Conduct CommitteeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- SER Margaret L. Workman v. Mitch Carmichael, as President of the SenateWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.