Legal Opinion

Dixon v. State

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 30, 1963No. 5151PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.

It is familiar law, frequently reiterated, that certiorari will not be granted where an adequate remedy is available on appeal. State v. Knowlton, 102 N. H. 221, 223; Salem Cooperative Bank v. Southwick, 102 N. H. 1, 3; Nashua v. Public Utilities Commission, 101 N. H. 503, 506; Waisman v. Manchester, 96 N. H. 50, 52. It is true that this rule does not operate with monolithic inflexibility and an exception can be made where there are compelling reasons to do so in the interests of justice. An example is Cloutier v. State Milk Control Board, 92 N. H. 199, 203, where certiorari was allowed to…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. New Hampshire Retail Grocers Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  2. King v. ThomsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API