Legal Opinion

Cincinnati, Wabash & Michigan Railway Co. v. Hiltzhauer

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1885No. 11,668PublishedCited by 26 opinions

From the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Elliott, J. —

The complaint of the appellee, omitting the formal parts, is as follows: “ The plaintiff, in the month of October, 1881, was the owner of one roan cow and one black cow and one white heifer, of the aggregate value of sixty-five dollars; and at the county of Grant and State of Indiana, about four miles north of the town of Marion, at a public crossing of a highway on defendant’s line of railroad, in the month of October or November, 1881, while said company was operating, by its employees, a locomotive and train of cars passed over and upon the said cattle and killed them.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Harty v. . Central R.R. Co. of New JerseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Pennsylvania Co. v. GallentineIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Indianapolis, Cincinnati, & Lafayette Railroad v. HarterIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis Railroad v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. City of Fort Wayne v. CoombsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. ButlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GramesIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API