Legal Opinion
Technographics, Inc. v. Mercer Corp.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 19, 1991No. 3:CV-89-0937PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
McCLURE, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Technographics, Inc. filed this action on June 19, 1989, alleging that defendant Mercer Corporation (“Mercer”) sold a defective coating machine to it in October of 1987. Technographics contends that the machine was negligently designed and manufactured, and that the sale of the machine violated the implied warranties of fitness of purpose and merchantability. Technographics maintains that the defendant is liable to it for consequential and incidental damages resulting from its purchase of the allegedly defective coating machine from…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Continental Insurance Co. v. Kenneth BodieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Farmer v. CarlsonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- REM Coal Co., Inc. v. Clark Equip. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- New York State Electric & Gas Corp. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Allen v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998
- Gulf States Utilities Co. v. NEI Peebles Electric Products, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1993
- Technographics, Inc. v. Mercer Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Crest Ridge Construction Group, Inc. v. Newcourt Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Crest Ridge Construction Group, Inc. v. Newcourt Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.