Legal Opinion

Cox v. Cox

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 2011No. SCWC-29593PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that (1) the Intermediate Court of Appeals (the ICA) properly affirmed the determination of the family court of the first circuit (the court) 1 that the Second Deed of Trust (SDT), discussed infra, was a separate, non-marital debt of Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Carlyn D. Cox (Petitioner); (2) Petitioner waived any argument pertaining to the court’s alleged failure to investigate or inquire as to whether Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee Brace E. Cox (Respondent) used marital assets to pay for his attorneys’ fees; (3) although not addressed by the ICA,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. MosesHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. CummingsHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. HoglundHawaii Supreme Court · 1990
  4. MDG Supply, Inc. v. Diversified Investments, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State v. RodriguesHawaii Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cox v. Cox.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Berry v. BerryHawaii Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Cox v. Cox.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Kakinami v. KakinamiHawaii Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Kakinami v. KakinamiHawaii Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API