Legal Opinion

Berry v. Berry

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 2012No. SCWC-10-0000044PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that (1) the Family Court of the First Circuit (the court) 1 did not abuse its discretion in denying Petitioner’s October 9, 2009 Motion to Set Aside Divorce Decree (Motion to Set Aside) seeking to set aside the November 21, 2008 Decree Granting Absolute Divorce and Awarding Child Custody (Divorce Decree) because Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Wayne Foster Berry (Petitioner) had notice that his failure to appear at a scheduled settlement conference would result in default, and the court acknowledged that Petitioner’s motion was for Hawaii Family Court…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Free v. BlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kosegarten v. Department of the Prosecuting AttorneyDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API