Royal Pizza House, Inc. v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Mencer,
Royal Pizza House, Inc. (employer) and its workmen’s compensation insurance carrier have appealed from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board which remanded this case to a referee for the purpose of making findings of fact which are, in the opinion of the Board, crucial to determining whether or not Curtis M. Buchan (claimant) was injured in the course of his employment.1 We quash the appeal.
Remand orders are interlocutory in nature, and appeals therefrom must therefore be quashed unless they *84fall within the exceptions established in Riley Stoker Corp. v.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Page's Department Store v. VelardiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Riley Stoker Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- United Metal Fabricators, Inc. v. ZindashCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Norato v. Tasty Cake Baking Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Buchan v. Royal Pizza House, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
3Cited by6 opinions
- Borovich v. Colt IndustriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Viwinco v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Myers v. Inter-State Tile & Mantel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Ortell v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Proctor & Gamble Paper Products v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.