Legal Opinion
United Metal Fabricators, Inc. v. Zindash
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 16, 1973No. Appeal, No. 475 C.D. 1972PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Wilkinson,
This is an appeal from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board remanding the case to the Referee for the purpose of taking additional testimony. The Referee had denied compensation on the basis that no “accident” within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, as amended, had occurred, and further that the injury alleged by claimant was the result of a pre-existing condition caused by an earlier injury.
In its opinion, the Appeal Board indicated that, upon remand, the Referee was to take further testimony *341as to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Besco v. General Woodcraft & FoundryCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Harris v. No. 1 Contracting Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Hale v. Metalweld, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
3Cited by48 opinions
- Royal Pioneer Ind. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Borovich v. Colt IndustriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Flynn v. Asten Hill Manufacturing Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Anzese v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. E-C Apparatus Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.