Legal Opinion

Proctor & Gamble Paper Products v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1992No. 56 C.D. 1992Published

1Opinion of the Court

COLINS, Judge.

Proctor and Gamble Paper Products (Employer) appeals an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the decision of the referee granting Norma Nafus (Claimant) total disability benefits for a psychiatric injury.

On May 23, 1989, Claimant filed a claim petition alleging that as of April 7, 1989, she was totally disabled because of a psychiatric injury sustained as a result of persistent harassment by Employer. Hearings were held before the referee, and, at the conclusion of the hearings, the referee made the following relevant findings of fact:

3.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Archer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Marsico v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Blecker v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Butler v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API