Legal Opinion
Riley Stoker Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 24, 1973No. Appeal, No. 1210 C.D. 1972PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Blatt,
Willie Jeeter (claimant) was employed by the Riley Stoker Corporation (employer). He suffered an injury while at work on May 7, 1971 and allegedly had two *535periods of disability thereafter during which he missed work and incurred certain medical expenses. On October 27, 1971, he filed a Claim Petition pursuant to The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act, Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, 77 P.S. §1 et seq., and, after a hearing, a referee awarded him compensation for the first period of disability but not for the second. The mailing date of this award notification was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Wise v. Cambridge Springs BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Overmiller v. D. E. Horn & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Yeager v. United Natural Gas Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Powell v. SonntagSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Royal Pioneer Ind. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Borovich v. Colt IndustriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Manolovich v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Flynn v. Asten Hill Manufacturing Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Pittsburgh Moose Lodge 46 v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.