Legal Opinion

Linden Gravel Mining Co. v. Sheplar

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1878No. 6225PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Eleventh Judicial District, El Dorado County. The plaintiff filed his complaint February 3rd, 1877, to quiet title to a tract of land. In March, 1878, the defendant, by his attorney, moved to dismiss the case, on the ground that no summons had been issued within the time required by law. The motion was signed: “ W. W. Likens, Attorney for Defendant for this motion only.” The. motion was granted, and the plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court :

1. The Court properly dismissed the action, inasmuch as the summons was not issued within one year after the complaint was filed. (Code of Civil Procedure, sec. 406.)

2. The appearance of defendant for the motion only to dismiss was not a general appearance which waived his right to make the motion.

Judgment affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Harrington v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Judson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Coombs v. ParishSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
  4. Milstein v. OgdenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Estate of HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API