Legal Opinion

Estate of Hyde

California Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1883PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County granting letters of administration. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Per curiam

L. A. Evans petitioned, as creditor, for letters of administration. M. P. Cutler petitioned for letters as public administrator. The petitions were heard together, and on the hearing the said Evans produced a written request from the father and heir of the estate that letters be granted to him, Evans. The father was a non-resident of this State. The court made an order that letters issue to Evans, and from this order Cutler appealed.

This was error. (See §§ 1369 and 1379, Code Civ. Proc.; also Estate of Cotter, 54 Cal. 217; Estate of Kelly, 57 Cal. 81; Estate of Morgan, 53 Cal. 245; Estate of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of BeechCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  2. In re Estate of CotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Linden Gravel Mining Co. v. SheplarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Estate of KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Estate of BedellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. In re Estate of Bedell, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1892
  3. In re Estate of Bergin, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1893
  4. In re Estate of Griffiths, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API