Legal Opinion

Milstein v. Ogden

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 4, 1948No. Civ. 15948PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

This is an action on a judgment. The Superintendent of Banks of California obtained a judgment in Yolo County against defendants Laura E. Ogden and her son and daughter, Fred R. Ogden and Laura R. Hiatt. Plaintiff purchased the judgment and commenced this action as assignee. Defendants made a motion to dismiss the action, as hereinafter stated, which motion was denied. A judgment by default was' entered herein against Fred Ogden and Laura Hiatt, but not against Laura Ogden. Thereafter, the defendants filed a notice of motion to quash service of summons, set aside the default judgment, and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Olcese v. Justice's Court of the First Judicial Twp.California Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Judson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. In re ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Brock v. FouchyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Anderson v. NawaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Berard Construction Co. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Slaybaugh v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Varra v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. HarrahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Santa Clara County Department of Family & Children's Services v. Brenda B.California Court of Appeal · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API