Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael Smith

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 27, 2001No. 99-3894PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOOD, District Judge.

On January 20, 1999, a federal grand jury sitting in the Southern District of Ohio charged Defendant Michael Smith and five co-defendants with drug-related offenses in a ten-count indictment. Defendant Smith was named in Counts I, II, and X of the indictment. Defendant Smith and his co-defendants pleaded guilty to Count I of the indictment, which is conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute cocaine base and cocaine from October 1, 1998, until January 20, 1999, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Count II of the indictment charged that Defendant Smith and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. United States v. Kenneth Joseph HillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Leonard Lloyd (92-2106) Shawn Huffman (92-2108) Darryl Little (92-2146) and Mario Taylor (92-2175)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Alan Louis BasharaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Clarence Carter v. Betty Mitchell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. Demico BootheCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  3. Highbaugh v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. ShowalterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  5. United States v. MacKetyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API