Legal Opinion
Clarence Carter v. Betty Mitchell, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 6, 2006No. 13-6558PublishedCited by 119 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner-Appellant Clarence Carter, an Ohio prisoner under sentence of death, appeals the order of the district court dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On appeal, he raises several claims challenging trial counsel’s effectiveness, and also challenges the prosecutor’s conduct and the sufficiency of the evidence in light of newly discovered evidence. For the reasons that follow, we AFFIRM the district court’s denial of Carter’s petition.
I. Facts and Procedural History
On direct appeal, the Ohio Supreme Court…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by119 opinions
- Davis v. LaflerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Darryl M. Durr v. Betty Mitchell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Henry Hodges v. Stanton Heidle, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Brooks v. TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Wynn Satterlee v. Hugh WolfenbargerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.