Legal Opinion
Jefferson v. Stinson Morrison Heckler LLP
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 7, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2016-0898PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge
The plaintiff in this civil action, Reverend David L. Jefferson, alleges that the defendant, Stinson Morrison Heeker LLP 1 (“Stinson”), discriminated against him on the basis of his disability, Third Amended Complaint (“Third Am. Compl”) ¶ 1, and brings claims against the defendant under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181-12189 (2012), the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (the “Human Rights Act”), D.C. Code Ann. §§ 2-1401.01-1404.04 (2001), and a claim of intentional infliction of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Inko-Tariah v. Budweiser Brew HouseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Inko-Tariah v. Capital One ArenaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Inko-Tariah v. Capital One ArenaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Inko-Tariah v. Events DcDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Jibril v. McAleenanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.