Legal Opinion

Inko-Tariah v. Capital One Arena

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 10, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2022-2802Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) CHARLES AWUSIN INKO-TARIAH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 22-cv-02802 (APM) ) CAPITAL ONE ARENA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION I. INTRODUCTION Pro se Plaintiff Charles Awusin Inko-Tariah asserts claims of disability discrimination against Capital One Arena, Washington Capitals Hockey Club, and parent company Monumental Sports and Entertainment after attending a hockey game in January 2022. Defendants have moved to dismiss for lack…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API