Inko-Tariah v. Capital One Arena
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) CHARLES AWUSIN INKO-TARIAH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 24-cv-02928 (APM) ) CAPITAL ONE ARENA, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________________ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION I. INTRODUCTION Pro se Plaintiff Charles Awusin Inko-Tariah asserts claims of disability discrimination against Capital One Arena and parent company Monumental Sports and Entertainment after attending a wrestling event in November 2023. Defendant has moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim. For the reasons…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.