Legal Opinion

Inko-Tariah v. Capital One Arena

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 10, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2024-2928Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) CHARLES AWUSIN INKO-TARIAH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 24-cv-02928 (APM) ) CAPITAL ONE ARENA, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________________ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION I. INTRODUCTION Pro se Plaintiff Charles Awusin Inko-Tariah asserts claims of disability discrimination against Capital One Arena and parent company Monumental Sports and Entertainment after attending a wrestling event in November 2023. Defendant has moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim. For the reasons…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API