Legal Opinion
Yellow Cab Co. v. Creasman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided June 8, 1923PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHoKE, J.
At the hearing there were facts submitted on part of plaintiff tending to show:
That prior to summer, 1922, the public-service automobile business in the city of Asheville was in an unsatisfactory condition from lack of uniform rates, overcharges, and other discriminations, which was a source of considerable trouble to the police department of the city of Asheville, and concern to the public interests.
That with a view of remedying this condition the Chamber of Commerce, through its secretary, N. Buckner, in conjunction with the owners of the Asheville Daily Citizen, invited the Yellow Cab…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Lawrence Manufacturing Co. v. Tennessee Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Goodyear's India Rubber Glove Manufacturing Co. v. Goodyear Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co. v. Hall's Safe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Polo Fashions, Inc. v. Craftex, Inc., and Bobby O'Neal and Keith O'neal, Polo Fashions, Inc. v. Craftex, Inc. Bobby O'Neal and Keith O'NealCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Amp Incorporated v. Howard J. Foy, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Quaker State Oil Refining Co. v. SteinbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Charcoal Steak House of Charlotte, Inc. v. StaleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Maola Ice Cream Co. v. Maola Milk & Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.