Legal Opinion

Sunbow Industries, Inc. v. London

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 7, 1982No. 8126SC1051PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

The defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint was properly allowed under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 12(b)(6) if the complaint has pled a fact that will necessarily defeat its claim. See Powell v. County of Haywood, 15 N.C. App. 109, 189 S.E. 2d 785 (1972). The defendant argues that the complaint shows on its face that the cause of action accrued more than three years prior to the filing of the complaint and is thus barred by G.S. 1-52(5). He contends that the complaint alleges that the last act of negligence occurred on 27 May 1976 which was the date the sale of the plaintiff’s property…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Powell v. County of HaywoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hargett v. HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. Head v. Gould Killian Cpa Grp., P.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  3. Garrett v. WinfreeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  4. Haywood Street Redevelopment Corp., Inc. v. Harry S. Peterson, Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  5. Thorpe v. DeMentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API