Legal Opinion

Hargett v. Holland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 9, 1994No. 377PA93PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Chief Justice.

This appeal presents the question whether a claim for professional malpractice against an attorney for alleged negligence in drafting a will is barred by the four-year statute of repose contained in our professional malpractice statute of limitations, N.C.G.S. § l-15(c)(1983), when the claim is filed more than 13 years after the attorney prepared the will and supervised its execution. Section l-15(c) provides:

Except where otherwise provided by statute, a cause of action for malpractice arising out of the performance of or failure to perform professional services shall be…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Boudreau v. BaughmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Rosenberg v. Town of North BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  3. Oates v. Jag, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Presnell v. PellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Jackson v. BumgardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. CTS Corp. v. WaldburgerSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Laster v. FrancisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Ray & Sons Masonry Contractors, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Horton v. Carolina Medicorp, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. NationsBank of North Carolina, N.A. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API