Legal Opinion

Haywood Street Redevelopment Corp., Inc. v. Harry S. Peterson, Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 21, 1995No. COA95-56PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREENE, Judge.

Haywood Street Redevelopment Corporation, Inc. (plaintiff) appeals from summary judgment entered 21 October 1994 in District Court for Buncombe County, North Carolina.

Harry S. Peterson, Co., Inc., (defendant) contracted on 9 February 1987 to install a waterproofing surface on plaintiffs parking deck. Defendant gave a written express warranty on 15 June 1988, which did not expire until 15 March 1993. The warranty provided:

[T]he sealant or waterproofing work provided under this warranty shall be free of defects related to the following causes for the stated warranty period.

1)…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bulova Watch Co. v. Celotex Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Forsyth Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Ontario Hydro v. Zallea Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1983
  4. Quail Hollow East Condominium Association v. Donald J. Scholz Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. MacK v. Hugh W. Comstock Associates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kaleel Builders, Inc. v. AshbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. Monson v. Paramount Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Hills Mach. Co., LLC v. Pea Creek MineCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  4. Liptrap v. City of High PointCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Whittaker v. ToddCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API