Costanza v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Frazer,
Defendant maintained an electric transformer forty-two inches high, resting on a low platform, located within a small rectangular enclosure four by eight feet, two sides of which were formed by the walls of a small “L” shaped building containing an air compressor and the other sides by a wire mesh fence about four feet high, the meshes of which were three by ten inches at the bottom and increasing to eight by ten inches at the top. Connected with the top of the transformer were lead-wires coming from an adjoining pole and carrying an electric current of 6,600…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mullen v. Wilkes-Barre Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- O'Leary v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Carr v. Southern Pennsylvania Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- O'Gara v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Blackstone v. Penn Central Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bartleson v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Altenbach, Et Ux. v. Leh. Val. R.R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Hogan v. Etna Concrete Block Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Reichvalder v. Borough of TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Novak v. Ford City BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.