Legal Opinion

Blackstone v. Penn Central Light & Power Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 17, 1915No. Appeal, No. 168PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal, No. 168, Jan. T., 1915, by plaintiffs, from judgment of C. P. Blair Co., Oct. T., 1915, No. 154, refusing to take off nonsuit, in case of Lloyd Theodore Blackstone by his next Friend and Mother, Margaret E. Blackstone, and Margaret E. Blackstone in her own right, v. Penn Central Light and Power Company, a Corporation under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania. Trespass to recover damages for injuries to a minor child.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 168, Jan. T., 1915, by plaintiffs, from judgment of C. P. Blair Co., Oct. T., 1915, No. 154, refusing to take off nonsuit, in case of Lloyd Theodore Blackstone by his next Friend and Mother, Margaret E. Blackstone, and Margaret E. Blackstone in her own right, v. Penn Central Light and Power Company, a Corporation under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania. Trespass to recover damages for injuries to a minor child. The facts appear in the following opinion of Baldrige, P. J., sur plaintiff’s motion to take off nonsuit: About nine miles east of Hollidaysburg, at a point where the…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This judgment is affirmed on the concise and clear opinion of the learned president judge of the court below, refusing to take off the nonsuit.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Powell v. LigonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Cox v. Des Moines Electric Light Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. Costanza v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Selve v. PilosiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  5. McCoy v. Texas Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API