Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Stamps v. Automatic Data Processing Board

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1989No. 88-682PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

Resolving this case requires us to answer the following questions. First, is a writ of mandamus available generally to prevent respondents from interfering in the execution of Stamps’ duties? Second, is a writ of mandamus available to order application for the appointment of special counsel for Stamps? Third, is a writ of mandamus' available to order the appointment of Nusbaum as supervisor of the center, and to order the approval of his salary? Fourth, is a writ *166of mandamus available to remove Judge Kessler from the board or to prevent Falke from representing it? For the reasons that follow,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State ex rel. Corrigan v. SeminatoreOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State ex rel. Gantt v. ColemanOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State ex rel. Commercial Lovelace Motor Freight, Inc. v. LancasterOhio Supreme Court · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State ex rel. Hillyer v. Tuscarawas Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Obojski v. PerciakOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State ex rel. Satow v. Gausse-MillikenOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State ex rel. Cunningham v. Amer Cunningham Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API