Legal Opinion

Allen v. County of Jackson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 12, 2000No. 97-0009-L-1; CA A102891PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*119ARMSTRONG, J.

Defendant Jackson County petitions for reconsideration of our opinion, Allen v. County of Jackson, 162 Or App 309, 986 P2d 612 (1999), in which we dismissed defendant’s appeal and plaintiffs’ cross-appeal for lack of a final judgment. We allow the petition to reconsider, vacate our original opinion and reverse on appeal and cross-appeal.

In November 1994, the voters of the State of Oregon enacted Measure 8, which amended the Oregon Constitution to require that public employees contribute six percent of their compensation to their retirement accounts. Measure 8 also prohibited…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Eckles v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Hughes v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Oregon State Police Officers' Ass'n v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Schulstad v. HUDSON OIL CO., INC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. Quillen v. Roseburg Forest Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Smurfit Newsprint Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. Allen v. County of Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Allen v. County of Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Trina Richardson v. Sunset Science Park Credit Union, a Federally Chartered Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Marshall v. Pollin Hotels II, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API