Quillen v. Roseburg Forest Products, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWollhejm, J.
Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s judgment for defendants after the trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiffs motion for leave to amend his complaint. The summary judgment was based on the trial court’s findings that plaintiffs claims were untimely and that plaintiff had “failed to come forward with any evidence creating a genuine issue of material fact of [sic] the merits of his claims.” Plaintiffs motion for leave to amend was disallowed as untimely, without sufficient excuse, and unduly prejudicial to defendants. We affirm.
The relevant facts…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Far West Landscaping, Inc. v. Pacific Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Jackson County v. Jackson Education Service DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hardie v. Legacy Health SystemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Ballard v. City of AlbanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Bloomfield v. WeaklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Allen v. County of JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Forsi v. HildahlCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.