Legal Opinion

Allen v. County of Jackson County

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 2006No. 97-0009-L1; CA A115689; SC S51180PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

This case involves the proper measure of damages for certain statutory wage claims. The underlying litigation resulted from a change in state law regarding who must pay employee pension contributions amounting to 6 percent of salary — a change later held unconstitutional. Before that change was declared unconstitutional, defendant Jackson County responded to it with a payroll scheme that deducted 6 percent from certain employees’ pay, but also simultaneously paid the same employees a 5.7 percent pay increase. Because the law requiring the 6 percent deduction was held unconstitutional, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Oregon State Police Officers' Ass'n v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Bolt v. Influence, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Thompson v. CoughlinOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Kinzua Lumber Co. v. DaggettOregon Supreme Court · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Arken v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Knepper v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. GranberryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. Brinkman v. Abm Onsite Servs. W., Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2019
  5. Kramer v. ConatserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API