Legal Opinion

Skoglund v. Staab

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1981No. 13261PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Justice.

This case is before us for the third time. In the first instance, Staab v. Skoglund, 89 S.D. 470, 234 N.W.2d 45 (1975), Staab had brought an action to cancel a warranty deed. We affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded with directions. The second time, in Skoglund v. Staab, 269 N.W.2d 401 (S.D.1978), Skoglund had brought an action for specific performance. We reversed and remanded. Thereafter, the parties proceeded to trial again and the trial judge, sitting without a jury, found for Skoglund, decreed specific performance and awarded $750 in attorney fees. Staab now…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. Yankton Clinic, P. A.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Mulder v. TagueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Peters v. LohrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Sabbagh v. Professional & Business Men's Life Ins. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  5. National Surety Corporation v. ShoemakerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. StrainSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Staab v. CameronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. First W. Bank, Sturgis v. Livestock YardsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Nizielski v. TvinnereimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Fox v. BurdenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API