Legal Opinion
State v. Bean
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 22, 2010No. 2D08-5542PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALTENBERND, Judge.
The State charged Mont Bean in one information with trafficking in oxycodone and in another information with multiple counts of obtaining drugs from a physician by withholding information. He filed motions to suppress the evidence obtained from a pharmacy and other medical sources. The trial court granted these motions and the State appealed. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
This suppression proceeding is unusual in several respects. The trial court had considered a similar motion to suppress in another case a few days before the hearing on these motions. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Herring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Hudson v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Riggs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. TamulonisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Hendley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Ruilova v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- State v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- State v. AlbrittonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.