Legal Opinion

Brooks v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 6, 2009No. 03-2470CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

WOLSKI, Judge.

Plaintiff Anthony J. Brooks seeks back pay, the correction of his records to indicate that he held the position of Chief Pharmacist Officer of the United States Public Health Service (“PHS”), and increased retirement pay resulting from this correction. After competing for this promotion and having been selected for the position by the Surgeon General, he received a Letter of Reprimand before the date he was to assume the office, and was denied the position. Before plaintiff had succeeded in having the Letter of Reprimand rescinded, competition for the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Chappell v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  4. David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stein v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API