Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Andco Farms, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 5, 1982No. Civ. 19767PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EVANS, J.

Defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint for personal injury was sustained without leave to amend. Plaintiff appeals from the ensuing judgment (order) of dismissal.

The principal issue presented by this appeal is whether the provisions of Insurance Code section 11583 1 should preclude defendant from asserting the one-year statute of limitations (Code Civ. Proc., § 340, subd. 3) as a bar to plaintiff’s personal injury action. We conclude it does not.

The chronology of events pertinent to our decision is as follows: On May 5, 1978, while operating a Honda motorcycle on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kunstman v. MirizziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Tubbs v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Llanera v. M & S Pipe Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bailey v. GreenbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Doe v. Roman Catholic Archbishop etc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Associated Truck Parts, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Morning Star Packing Co. v. Crown Cork & Seal Co. (USA)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Morning Star Packing Co. v. Crown Cork & Seal Co. (USA)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API