Legal Opinion
Kunstman v. Mirizzi
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 3, 1965No. Civ. 453PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN (R. M.), J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing her third amended complaint for damages for personal injuries assertedly sustained by her after a demurrer interposed by the defendants was sustained without leave to amend on the ground that the action was barred by the one-year statute of limitations embodied in section 340, subdivision 3, of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Plaintiff, a Utah resident, sustained injuries in an accident on September 26, 1962, which occurred on a public highway in Visalia, California. By appropriate allegations in her complaint filed January 23, 1964,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Howard v. West Jersey, C., R.R. Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
- Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Carruth v. FritchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- California Cigarette Concessions, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Benner v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Steinhart v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Spray, Gould & Bowers v. Associated International InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Calfarm Insurance v. KrusiewiczCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Tubbs v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Kupka v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.