Morning Star Packing Co. v. Crown Cork & Seal Co. (USA)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Morning Star Packing Company, L.P. and California Fruit and Tomato Kitchens, *401L.L.C. appeal the district court’s judgment in favor of Crown Cork & Seal Company (USA), Inc. We affirm.(1) Principally, Morning Star and California Fruit assert that the district court erred when it rejected them request for reformation to add (or effectually substitute) California Fruit as a party to an agreement that tolled the statute of limitations as to Morning Star only. Under California law, there was no error. We review the district court’s denial of leave to amend the agreement in dispute under…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Tenet v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Bankers Trust Company, Cross-Appellee v. Old Republic Insurance Company, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Lantzy v. Centex HomesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Aaron Fox Toni Fox, Husband and Wife v. Citicorp Credit Services, Inc., a South Dakota Corporation Jerold Kaplan Jane Doe Kaplan, Husband and WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.