Legal Opinion

Andrushchenko v. Silchuk

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 2008No. 24464PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEIERHENRY, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Alex and Nataliya Andrushchenko (Andrushchenkos), as guardians ad litem of their minor child D.A., and Nataliya Andrushchenko, individually, brought suit against Ivan and Lyuba Silehuk (Silchuks), Metzger Construction, Inc., and M <& M Plumbing-HVAC, L.L.C. (M & M) (collectively defendants) for injuries that D.A. sustained from scalding water in the Sil-chuks’ bathtub. The circuit court granted summary judgment to the defendants. Andrushchenkos appeal. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

[¶ 2.] The circuit court was presented with certain undisputed facts. On…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Burley v. Kytec Innovative Sports Equipment, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Erickson v. LavielleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Fisher Sand & Gravel Co. v. State Ex Rel. South Dakota Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Hendrix v. SchulteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Zens v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Janis v. Nash Finch Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Klutman v. Sioux Falls StormSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. O'neill v. O'neillSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Millea v. EricksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Zerfas v. AMCO Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API