Andrushchenko v. Silchuk
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MEIERHENRY, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Alex and Nataliya Andrushchenko (Andrushchenkos), as guardians ad litem of their minor child D.A., and Nataliya Andrushchenko, individually, brought suit against Ivan and Lyuba Silehuk (Silchuks), Metzger Construction, Inc., and M <& M Plumbing-HVAC, L.L.C. (M & M) (collectively defendants) for injuries that D.A. sustained from scalding water in the Sil-chuks’ bathtub. The circuit court granted summary judgment to the defendants. Andrushchenkos appeal. We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
[¶ 2.] The circuit court was presented with certain undisputed facts. On…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Burley v. Kytec Innovative Sports Equipment, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Erickson v. LavielleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Fisher Sand & Gravel Co. v. State Ex Rel. South Dakota Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Hendrix v. SchulteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Zens v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Janis v. Nash Finch Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Klutman v. Sioux Falls StormSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- O'neill v. O'neillSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Millea v. EricksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Zerfas v. AMCO Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.