Legal Opinion

Coxsey v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 21, 1948No. 32200PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, V.C.J.

This is the second appeal in this case. The action was one for a money judgment for the recovery of usurious interest and was brought by defendant in error, Julia E. Taylor, as plaintiff, against plaintiff in error, W. G. Coxsey, Bell Loan Company and another, as defendants. By consent of parties the cause was tried by the court without the aid of a jury, and resulted in a judgment .for plaintiff against the defendants above named. On appeal therefrom this court affirmed the judgment against Bell Loan Company and reversed it as to W. G. Coxsey for insufficiency of the evidence…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Hardy, District JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Ball v. RankinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Great Northern Life Ins. v. Farmers' Union Co-Operative Gin Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. City of Seminole v. MooringSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Atlantic Refining Co. v. FulsomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Muncrief v. Memorial Hospital of Southern OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Hays v. L. C. I., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. Stekoll v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Muncrief v. Memorial Hospital of Southern OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API