Legal Opinion

Stekoll v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 21, 1952No. 34332PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALLEY, V.C.J.

The parties here have reversed their positions of plaintiff and defendants in the trial court, and will be referred to according to the positions they occupied there.

Plaintiff was the owner of a quarter section of land in Okfuskee county on which he pastured 21 head of cattle. Defendant Albert Stekoll was the owner of an oil and gas lease on this quarter section and was producing oil from a well on this land. The plaintiff claimed damage to the cattle that were grazing on this land, alleging that they were injured by virtue of drinking salt water that came from defendant’s oil…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Weitz v. MouldenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Thompson v. CokerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Sun Oil Co. v. HokeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  4. Thompson v. WalshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  5. Coxsey v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Duke v. DukeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  2. DUKE v. DUKESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  3. DUKE v. DUKESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API