Legal Opinion
Bienert v. YANKTON SCHOOL DIST., 63-3
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 27, 1993No. 18277PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, Justice.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY/ISSUES
Following the December 15, 1992 Special School District Bond Election for Yankton School District 63-3 (hereinafter School District), a group of local taxpayers (hereinafter Bienert) sought an injunction declaring “Question No. 1,” concerning the construction of a new high school, to be void and preventing the School District from issuing the related bonds. In its January 27, 1993 Memorandum Opinion and February 23,1993 Judgment, the trial court dismissed Bienert’s request for injunctive relief and further ruled that the bond election statutes were…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- National Bank v. County of YanktonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Meyerink v. Northwestern Public Service Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Utter v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- South Dakota Board of Regents v. HeegeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Nelson v. School Board of the Hill City School District No. 51-2South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Central Monitoring Service, Inc. v. ZakinskiSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Knodel v. Kassel TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Rindal v. SohlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- THOM & MILLER v. BARNETT/ELECTION CONTEST AS TO AMENDMENT ASouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Bienert v. YANKTON SCHOOL DIST., 63-3South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.