Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Rindal v. Sohler

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 2003No. NonePublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORS, Circuit Judge.

[¶ 1.] Daniel C. Rindal (Rindal) and Raymond J. Shape (Shape) sued Gail Soh-ler and Janet Sohler (Sohlers) for failure to carry out the provisions of an agreement for cancellation of contracts for deed. The trial court entered an order for equitable adjustment. Sohlers appealed. Rin-dal and Shape filed a notice of review. We reverse.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] Rindal and Shape bought a 2,700 acre ranch from Sohlers in 1987 for $840,000 on two contracts for deed. Rin-dal and Shape were feeding up to 20,000 to 30,000 head of cattle for the Louis Dreyfus Company. The Dreyfus deal soured over…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Gross v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. LPN Trust v. Farrar Outdoor Advertising, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. First W. Bank, Sturgis v. Livestock YardsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Anderson v. KennedySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Weitzel v. Sioux Valley Heart PartnersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. LaMar Advertising of South Dakota, Inc. v. Heavy Constructors, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. McCollam v. CahillSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. In the Matter of Estate of SiebrasseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Rabo Agrifinance, Inc. v. Rock Creek Farms, FinnemansSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API