Legal Opinion

Central Monitoring Service, Inc. v. Zakinski

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1996No. NonePublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRusch, Circuit Judge

The defendant, Stanley Zakinski (Za-kinski) appeals from a decision of the trial court granting an injunction which forbids him from working for any competitor of Central Monitoring Service, Inc. (Central) in the State of South Dakota for a period of two years or from disclosing certain information about Central at any time. 1

We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.

ISSUES

This case presents two different issues, namely, whether a noncompetition agreement entered into subsequent to the original employment contract requires addi tional consideration and whether the agreement at issue here…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hopper v. All Pet Animal Clinic, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Poppen v. WalkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Central Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. IngramTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Insulation Corp. of America v. BrobstonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Bertotti v. CE SHEPHERED CO., INC.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Revere Transducers, Inc. v. Deere & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  2. Prairie Lakes Health Care System, Inc. v. WookeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Ward v. Midcom, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Communication Technical Systems, Inc. v. DensmoreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Hot Stuff Foods, LLC v. Mean Gene's Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API