Legal Opinion

Calandro v. Parkerson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 3, 1997No. 95-825PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W.H.“Dub” Arnold, Chief Justice.

The appellants, Janet Calandro and Dale Suezaki, were the sole shareholders in U and Me, Inc., a Hot Springs convenience store. As individuals, appellants filed suit for legal malpractice, deceit, and breach of contract against appellee John W. Parkerson. The trial court granted summary judgment in appellee’s favor on the basis that the causes of action alleged were those of the corporation, not the individual appellants. We affirm summary judgment as to the claims for malpractice and breach of contract, but reverse and remand the trial court’s ruling on…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Cordes v. Outdoor Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Clark v. RidgewaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Reagan v. City of PiggottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  5. Renfro v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Foremost Ins. Co. v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  2. Marcum v. WengertSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Seeco, Inc. v. HalesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Allen v. AllisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Sexton Law Firm, P.A. v. MilliganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API